Journal Information
Vol. 62. Issue 3.
Pages 198-204 (July - September 2018)
Download PDF
More article options
Vol. 62. Issue 3.
Pages 198-204 (July - September 2018)
Biological Control and Crop Protection
DOI: 10.1016/j.rbe.2018.07.002
Open Access
Isolation, morphological and molecular characterization of Bacillus thuringiensis strains against Hypothenemus hampei Ferrari (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae)
Janaina Zorzettia,
Corresponding author

Corresponding author.
, Ana Paula Scaramal Riciettoa, Fernanda Aparecida Pires Faziona, Ana Maria Meneghinb, Pedro Manuel Oliveira Janeiro Nevesa, Laurival Antonio Vilas-Boasa, Gislayne Trindade Vilas-Bôasa
a Universidade Estadual de Londrina, Londrina, PR, Brazil
b Instituto Agronômico do Paraná. Londrina, PR, Brazil
Article information
Full Text
Download PDF
Tables (3)
Table 1. Mortality caused by B. thuringiensis against first instar larvae of H. hampei on the five days of the selective bioassay (dark chamber, 25±2°C, 60±10% RH).
Table 2. Median lethal concentration (LC50) of B. thuringiensis strains against first instar larvae of H. hampei (n=60) on the 5 days of the dose–response bioassay (dark chamber, 25±2°C, 60±10% RH).
Table 3. Genetic and protein profiles of B. thuringiensis strains selected in a bioassay against H. hampei.
Show moreShow less

The coffee berry borer Hypothenemus hampei Ferrari, 1876 (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae) is considered the most serious pest of the coffee crop and is controlled primarily with the use of chemical insecticides. An alternative to this control method is the use of the entomopathogenic bacterium, Bacillus thuringiensis Berliner, 1911. Therefore, the objective of this work was to select strains of B. thuringiensis virulent against H. hampei and characterize them by morphological and molecular methods to identify possible genes for the production of genetically modified plants. To achieve this objective, 34 strains of B. thuringiensis underwent a selective bioassay to evaluate their toxicity to H. hampei first-instar larvae. Among the strains tested, 11 and the standard B. thuringiensis subspecies israelensis (IPS-82) caused mortality above 90%. Then, the median lethal concentration (LC50) was estimated for these strains followed by characterization using morphological, biochemical and molecular methods. The lowest LC50 was obtained for strain BR58, although this concentration did not differ significantly from that of the standard strain IPS-82 or from that of strains BR137, BR80 and BR67. The molecular characterization detected cry4A, cry4B, cry10, cry11 and cyt1 genes in 10 of the most virulent strains (BR58, BR137, BR80, BR81, BR147, BR135, BR146, BR138, BR139, BR140). Strain BR67 differed completely from the others and amplified only the cry3 gene. This strain was more virulent than BR135, BR146, BR138, BR139 and BR140, but it did not differ from BR58, BR137, BR80, BR81 and BR147. The protein profile revealed proteins of 28, 65, 70 and 130kDa, and the morphological analysis identified spherical crystalline inclusions in all strains. The results showed that the 11 strains studied have potential for use as a gene source for insertion into coffee plants for the control H. hampei, especially the cry3, cry4A, cry4B, cry10, cry11 and cyt1 genes, that were repeated in the most virulent isolates.

Biological control
Entomopathogenic bacteria
Coffee berry borer
Cry proteins
Full Text

The role of the coffee crop is extremely significant in the wealth and financial resources of producing and consuming countries and is also of crucial importance in the economy and politics of many developing countries (USDA, 2014). However, coffee crops are faced with several phytosanitary problems, which include the coffee berry borer Hypothenemus hampei Ferrari, 1867 (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae), considered the major pest that attacks the coffee crop (Vega et al., 2012a).

H. hampei occurs in almost all coffee-producing countries (Vega et al., 2012b), causing damage to crops and severe economic losses. Adult females produce internal galleries in the coffee berry to lay their eggs, and the larval feeding causes damages that reduce yields and the quality of the seed and can also result in the abscission of the berry (Vega et al., 2009). Research investigating different control methods is underway, but the internal feeding habit of remaining most of the life cycle inside the coffee fruit hampers management.

Chemical control is the widest method used for control of the coffee berry borer, but in addition to high cost, health and environmental damage, few efficient and safe active ingredients are registered for managing this pest (Reis, 2007; Souza et al., 2013). Endosulfan (C9H6Cl6O3S) is a broad-spectrum insecticide and is the most efficient product against H. hampei. However, due to human and environmental risks related to its use, endosulfan has been banned, which increases the importance of research on new methods of control (Janssen, 2011; Lubick, 2010).

Among the control alternatives causing less environmental damage is the use of the entomopathogenic fungus Beauveria bassiana (Bals.) Vuill. that is considered one potential biological control agent for coffee berry borer and has been used as a safe bioinsecticide due to properties like nontoxicity to workers and low impact on non-target organisms including coffee berry borer natural enemies. However, there are some disadvantages of using B. bassiana under field conditions since the fungus effectiveness depends on good weather conditions like high humidity and mild temperatures and other factors, including the strain, concentration, virulence and application efficiency (Vega et al., 2012a).

The use of bacterium Bacillus thuringiensis (Berliner, 1911) is also one of the alternatives to reduce the use of chemical insecticides for the coffee berry borer control. The entomopathogenic action of this species is produced by crystal proteins, which are formed by Cry proteins encoded by different cry genes (Angelo et al., 2010; Vidal-Quist et al., 2009; Vilas-Bôas et al., 2007), which can be inserted into the plant genome by genetic manipulation of coffee plants, which is considered an important strategy of control, since the pest behavior makes it more difficult. Besides this, a genetically modified plant can reduce the influence of abiotic factors on entomopathogen agents. Considering that many potential new strains and their genes remain unknown, their contents and potential for use as an alternative strategy in insect control must be identified (Sun et al., 2008).

B. thuringiensis subsp. israelensis IPS-82strain contains the genes cry4, cry10, cry11 and cyt (Schnepf et al., 1998), and although active against Diptera, were also toxic to H. hampei (Méndez-López et al., 2003). More recently, strains with cry1Ba and cry3Aa genes were also identified because of their insecticidal activity against this beetle pest (López-Pazos et al., 2009).

The results obtained by various authors highlight the importance of mosquitocidal strains in the control of coleopterans, such as Anthonomus grandis Boheman, 1843 (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) and H. hampei, and have stimulated research on the effect of genes active against dipterans for the control of Coleoptera (Méndez-López et al., 2003; Monnerat et al., 2012).

Therefore, in addition to selecting strains of B. thuringiensis toxic to the insect, the genetic profile of these strains must also be identified for a thorough study of their cry gene contents. Thus, the purpose of this work was to select strains of B. thuringiensis virulent against H. hampei and then characterize them by morphological and molecular methods for possible use as a source of genes to produce genetically modified plants.

Materials and methodsRearing of H. hampei stock on an artificial diet

H. hampei used in the bioassays were reared and maintained in Petri plates containing artificial diet (Villacorta and Barrera, 1993). The plates were kept in a dark climate chamber (25±2°C, 60±10% RH) at the Laboratory of Ecological Pest Management of the Agronomic Institute of Paraná-IAPAR. After 30 days, the Petri plates were opened to collect and transfer eggs to new plates with artificial diet in which they remained until sufficient numbers of first instar larvae were available for use in the bioassays.

Production of the spore/crystal suspension

Strains of B. thuringiensis obtained from soil samples, stored in a filter paper in the form of spores and crystals, were recovered on Petri plates with nutrient agar (NA) and kept under controlled conditions (30°C) for 96h to complete sporulation. Then, the cultures of each strain were scraped from the culture media with the help of a Drigalski spatula and transferred into microcentrifuge tubes. These mixtures of spores and crystals, quantified using a Neubauer as 1×109 spores/mL for all strains, were used to perform the bioassays.

Selective bioassay of strains of B. thuringiensis active against H. hampei

This bioassay was conducted with 34 strains of B. thuringiensis from the Collection of Entomopathogenic Microorganisms (Laboratory of Genetics and Taxonomy of Microorganisms) of the State University of Londrina (Universidade Estadual de Londrina–UEL) that were identified by the presence of Cry proteins toxic to the orders Coleoptera and Diptera. B. thuringiensis subsp. israelensis IPS-82 strain and B. thuringiensis subsp. kurstaki HD-1 were provided as a courtesy of the Pasteur Institute, Paris, and were used as positive and negative controls, respectively (Méndez-López et al., 2003). For the bioassays, artificial diet (Villacorta and Barrera, 1993) was distributed (3mL/well) in a square polymethylmethacrylate plates (10cm×10cm) consisting of 16 wells (1.8cm diameter by 1.5cm depth). After diet solidification, 50μL of the mixture of spores and crystals was added to each well. After complete drying of the suspension, five first instar larvae were placed in each well. The insects were maintained in a dark climate chamber (25±2°C, 60±10% RH) for 5 days and then mortality was quantified. The bioassay was performed in duplicate and consisted of 12 repetitions with five larvae each. All 12 repetitions were performed in the same dish with 16 wells, with the remaining 4 wells used as negative and positive controls. The strains that caused mortality above 90% were selected for further studies. Mortality data were submitted to the Scott–Knott test (p<0.05) using SASM-Agri software (Canteri et al., 2001).

Estimation of the median lethal concentration (LC50) of B. thuringiensis strains

The dose bioassays involved the 11 most virulent strains and IPS-82 as the standard strain. Seven concentrations (100, 30, 10, 3, 1, 0.3 and 0.1%) of each strain were prepared from the initial suspension of spores and crystals (100%) used in the selective bioassays (1×109spores/mL for all strains). These suspensions were diluted in sterile water with Tween at 0.01%. For each concentration, 12 repetitions were performed divided among three square polymethylmethacrylate plates. In each plate, four lines with four wells each were used for different concentrations. Thus, in the three plates, 12 repetitions of four different concentrations were performed. Each well containing five larvae (n=60) was used as one repetition, as in the selective bioassay, and received 50μL of a suspension. The insects were maintained in a dark climate chamber (25±2°C, 60±10% RH) for 5 days, followed by quantification of mortality. The bioassays were repeated twice, and the mortality data were subjected to probit analysis (Finney, 1971) using the Polo-PC program (LeOra Software, 1987) to determine the lethal concentration. The LC50 bioassay results were analyzed by checking for overlap of the 95% confidence intervals according to probit analysis.

Molecular characterization of B. thuringiensis strains toxic to H. hampei

Total DNA samples from strains of B. thuringiensis were extracted according to the method described by Ricieto et al. (2013). The strains were grown at 30°C for 15h on plates containing Luria–Bertani broth (LB) (Bertani, 1951). A colony of approximately 2mm in diameter was transferred to a microtube containing 200μL of TE buffer (10mM Tris; 1mM EDTA; pH 8.0) using a sterile toothpick. The suspension was homogenized and incubated for 10min in a boiling water bath. Then, the suspension was centrifuged at 12000g for 3min. The supernatant was transferred to a new microcentrifuge tube and used as a DNA sample for PCR amplification reactions (polymerase chain reaction). The presence of cry1, cry2, cry3, cry4A, cry4B, cry10, cry11 and cyt1 was evaluated using primers and specific amplification conditions. All reactions underwent an initial denaturation step at 94°C for 2min and a final extension step at 72°C for 5min performed as described by the authors (Bravo et al., 1998; Céron et al., 1995; Ibarra et al., 2003; Vidal-Quist et al., 2009). DNA amplification was performed using a Techne® Endurance TC-412 Thermal Cycler (Techne Limited, Staffordshire, UK). Each amplification reaction was mixed in a total volume of 20μL containing 1U Taq DNA polymerase (Invitrogen, Brazil), buffer (20mM Tris–HCl, pH 8.0, 50mM KCl), 1.5mM MgCl2, 0.25mM dNTPs, 0.5μM each primer, 2μL of extracted DNA and sterilized Milli-Q water). The same reaction was used for all primers described. The amplified products were visualized by electrophoresis on 1.2% agarose gel in TBE buffer (89mM Tris–borate, 2mM EDTA, pH 8.0) stained with SYBR® Safe (Invitrogen, UK) using a 100bp marker DNA Ladder (Invitrogen, UK). After electrophoresis, the gel images were captured using a Sony Cyber-shot 8.1 digital camera.

Characterization of Cry proteins through SDS–PAGE

The protein profiles of the crystals of B. thuringiensis strains were characterized by protein electrophoresis on 10% polyacrylamide gel (SDS–PAGE). Initially, the crystals were obtained according to the protocol described by Lecadet et al. (1992). Each strain was cultivated in Nutrient Broth medium (NB) (Downes and Ito, 2001) at 30°C for 72h at 200rpm, until complete sporulation. The preparations of the strain spores/crystals were analyzed by SDS–PAGE according to the procedure outlined by Laemmli (1970). For electrophoresis in Tris–glycine buffer at a constant voltage of 30mA for 3h, 15μL of solubilized spore-crystal preparations was used. B. thuringiensis subsp. israelensis strain IPS-82, with a known protein profile, was used as a reference.

Morphological characterization of B. thuringiensis strains

The morphological characterization of the strains was initially performed using an optical microscope (CHS Model; Olympus Optical Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) with a 100× phase contrast lens. For electron microscopy, the lyophilized material of the strains used in the bioassays was deposited directly on metal supports coated with gold for 180s undervacuum (10-1mbar) at a current intensity of 40mA in a BAL-TEC sputter Coater Model SCD-050 and analyzed on a Philips FEI Quanta 200 scanning electron microscope QUANTA 200 (EIF) under high vacuum at a voltage of 20kV with a 10.2mm working distance.

ResultsSelective bioassay of B. thuringiensis strains against H. hampei

Thirty-four strains of B. thuringiensis were included in the selective bioassay. Among these strains, 11 (32.3%) caused mortality to H. hampei larvae that exceeded 96%, which did not differ significantly among the 11 strains or from the standard IPS-82 strain. These 11 strains underwent quantitative bioassays to determine the median lethal concentration (LC50). The remaining 23 strains (67.6%) caused mortality rates below 21.2%. Among these strains, BR09 and BR187 and the standard strain B. thuringiensis subsp. kurstaki HD-1 were non-pathogenic to H. hampei (Table 1).

Table 1.

Mortality caused by B. thuringiensis against first instar larvae of H. hampei on the five days of the selective bioassay (dark chamber, 25±2°C, 60±10% RH).

Strain  Mortality (%)a  Strain  Mortality (%)a 
IPS-82b  100.00a  BR127  10.00c 
BR80  100.00a  BR145  10.00c 
BR81  100.00a  BR78  8.75c 
BR140  98.80a  BR164  8.75c 
BR58  98.75a  BR07  7.50c 
BR67  98.75a  BR83  6.25c 
BR135  98.75a  BR141  6.25c 
BR137  98.75a  BR143  6.25c 
BR139  98.75a  S1269  5.00c 
BR147  98.75a  BR03  5.00c 
BR146  97.50a  BR05  3.75c 
BR138  96.25a  BR87  3.75c 
BR37  21.25b  BR43  1.25c 
BR79  21.25b  BR148  1.25c 
BR18  20.00b  BR09  0.00c 
BR131  17.50b  BR187  0.00c 
BR149  16.25b  HD1c  0.00c 
BR105  15.00b     
BR38  15.00b  Control sample  1.25c 

Means followed by the same letter in the columns do not differ from each other according to the Scott–Knott test (p<0.05).


B. thuringiensis subsp. israelensis standard IPS-82 strain-positive control.


B. thuringiensis subsp. kurstaki standard HD-1 strain-negative control.

Estimation of median lethal concentration (LC50) of B. thuringiensis strains

The LC50 for the H. hampei larvae ranged from 0.037×109 to 0.956×109spores/mL. The lowest LC50 was for the BR58 strain, which did not differ significantly from the standard IPS-82. No significant differences were detected among the LC50 values of BR58, BR137, IPS82, BR80 and BR67strains, which showed the best results and were the most effective against H. hampei (Table 2).

Table 2.

Median lethal concentration (LC50) of B. thuringiensis strains against first instar larvae of H. hampei (n=60) on the 5 days of the dose–response bioassay (dark chamber, 25±2°C, 60±10% RH).

Strain  LC50 (Spores/mL)  95% CISlope±SE 
    Lower  Upper   
BR58  0.037×109a*  0.017×109  0.070×109  1.410±0.124 
BR137  0.039×109a  0.023×109  0.067×109  1.227±0.108 
IPS-82  0.040×109ab  0.017×109  0.080×109  1.519±0.137 
BR80  0.049×109abc  0.024×109  0.089×109  1.402±0.122 
BR67  0.113×109abc  0.050×109  0.104×109  1.543±0.163 
BR81  0.114×109bcd  0.074×109  0.169×109  0.998±0.097 
BR147  0.148×109cde  0.089×109  0.243×109  1.292±0.107 
BR135  0.164×109de  0.122×109  0.217×109  1.430±0.128 
BR146  0.196×109de  0.134×109  0.273×109  1.232±0.137 
BR138  0.251×1090.180×109  0.344×109  1.348±0.159 
BR139  0.297×1090.203×109  0.424×109  1.159±0.140 
BR140  0.956×1090.624×109  1.60×109  1.049±0.183 

Means followed by the same letter in the column do not differ from each other by overlapping of 95% confidence intervals, according to probit analysis.

In a second group classified by the LC50 values, the strains (BR147, BR135 and BR146) differed from the standard IPS-82 strain and from the strains that had the lowest LC50 values (BR58 and BR137). The exception was the BR81strain, which did not differ significantly from the IPS-82 strain but was also inserted in this group.

The third group comprised the BR138 and BR139 strains, which showed an LC50 value higher than that of the five most toxic strains. Finally, the BR140 strain, with the lowest toxicity, differed from all other strains and had the highest LC50 value. As the exception, the BR81 strain LC50 value was approximately threefold higher than that of the BR58 and BR137 strains but was not different from those of the BR80 and BR67 strains and from that of the standard IPS-82 strain.

The BR58 strain was approximately 25-fold more toxic than the BR140 strain, which showed the highest LC50 value and differed from all other strains (Table 2). These isolates for which median lethal concentration (LC50) values were determined were selected for further molecular, morphological and protein characterization.

Molecular characterization of B. thuringiensis strains against H. hampei

In the molecular characterization, different cry gene groups were detected in the B. thuringiensis strains. The combination cry4A, cry4B, cry10, cry11 and cyt1 was observed in 10 strains, which exhibited an amplification product similar to that expected for B. thuringiensis subsp. israelensis (cry4Aa, cry4Ba, cry10Aa, cry11Aa, cyt1Aa, cyt1Ca and cyt2Ba, located on a single plasmid of 72MDa) (Berry et al., 2002; Guerchicoff et al., 1997; Ibarra et al., 2003). BR67 was the only strain that did not show any amplification product for the above genes and amplified only for the cry3 gene, which has insecticidal activity against coleopterans (Schnepf et al., 1998) (Table 3).

Table 3.

Genetic and protein profiles of B. thuringiensis strains selected in a bioassay against H. hampei.

Strain  Genetic profile  Protein profile (kDa) 
BR58  cry4A, cry4B, cry10, cry11, cyt1  130/70 
BR137  cry4A, cry4B, cry10, cry11, cyt1  130/65 
IPS-82  cry4A, cry4B, cry10, cry11, cyt1  130/70/28 
BR80  cry4A, cry4B, cry10, cry11, cyt1  130/70 
BR67  cry3  65/70 
BR81  cry4A, cry4B, cry10, cry11, cyt1  130/70 
BR147  cry4A, cry4B, cry10, cry11, cyt1  130/65 
BR135  cry4A, cry4B, cry10, cry11, cyt1  130 
BR146  cry4A, cry4B, cry10, cry11, cyt1  130 
BR138  cry4A, cry4B, cry10, cry11, cyt1  130/65 
BR139  cry4A, cry4B, cry10, cry11, cyt1  130 
BR140  cry4A, cry4B, cry10, cry11, cyt1  130/65 
Morphological and protein characterization

The analysis of the protein profiles of spore and crystal mixtures by electrophoresis on 10% polyacrylamide gel (SDS–PAGE) of the strains more toxic to H. hampei revealed bands of 28, 65, 70 and 130kDa (Table 3). The protein profile of the strain used as the standard, B. thuringiensis subsp. israelensis (IPS-82), was similar to that previously reported, with bands at 27, 65, 128 and 135kDa (Becker and Margalit, 1993).

All profiles analyzed, except that for BR67, had a molecular mass of 130kDa, which is often related to the crystal proteins of Cry4A and Cry4B classes with a molecular weight range 128–135kDa (Lereclus et al., 1989). BR58 strain presented peptides of 130kDa, which might be correlated with Cry4 proteins. The BR58 strain also had peptides of 70kDa, which could be associated with both the Cry10 (∼78kDa) (Thorne et al., 1986) and Cry11 proteins (∼72kDa) (Delécluse et al., 1995). Almost all strains revealed molecular masses from 65 to 70kDa, confirming the presence of the expected genes (cry10 and cry11).

The morphological analysis by optical and scanning electron microscopy confirmed the typical characteristics of strains of the species B. thuringiensis, i.e., spores, crystals and rod-shaped vegetative cells. The images revealed that all strains had spherical crystals, very similar to those found in B. thuringiensis subsp. israelensis.


Among the 34 strains tested against H. hampei in the selective bioassay, 11 were the most toxic and presented morphological (spherical crystals) and molecular (cry4A, cry4B, cry10, cry11 and cyt1) characteristics and protein profiles (130/70–65kDa) similar to one another and to the B. thuringiensis subsp. israelensis standard IPS-82 (Table 3). This molecular profile of the strains is responsible for the high toxicity to Diptera. Nevertheless, this combination of morphological, molecular and protein profiles has previously been cited as a control agent against Coleoptera, such as H. hampei and A. grandis (Méndez-López et al., 2003; Monnerat et al., 2012). The strains containing cry1, cry2 and cry3, such as strain BR145 (Ricieto et al., 2013), which has active genes against Coleoptera, showed low toxicity to H. hampei causing only 10% mortality (Table 1).

Méndez-López et al. (2003) achieved similar results. After evaluating 170 B. thuringiensis strains for the control of H. hampei, these authors found that only 32 caused mortality between 90 and 100%. They also observed that the Diptera-specific strains had similar molecular, morphological and protein characterization and were active against Aedes aegypti Linnaeus, 1762 (Diptera: Culicidae). The authors also tested nine strains with mosquitocidal activity against H. hampei provided by the Pasteur Institute. They observed that B. thuringiensis subspecies israelensis and thompsoni obtained 100% mortality and the morrisoni (PG14) and malaysiensis subspecies caused a mortality rate above 80% and did not differ significantly from the most toxic strains.

The BR58 and BR137 strains, which had the lowest LC50 values, amplified the cry4A, cry4B, cry10, cry11 and cyt1 genes. These strains also exhibited bands of 130 and 65–70kDa, which might be related to the cry4A and cry4B genes and to the cry10 and cry11 genes, respectively (Monnerat et al., 2012). The BR135, BR146 and BR139 strains showed the same gene pool as the most virulent strains but presented only one band of 130kDa. These three strains resulted in higher LC50 values, suggesting that the low toxicity was either due to low levels of or to the lack of expression of the cry10, cry11 and cyt1 genes.

The PCR technique provides a rapid and superficial molecular characterization based on the primers used. However, the technique cannot identify all genes in a strain or detect whether a gene is expressed. For example, the cry10, cry11 and cyt1 amplified genes of BR135, BR146 and BR139 strains, respectively, might be present at very low levels or be disrupted, mutated or under the control of a defective promoter. Therefore, the contribution to the lethal effect against the pest was low, or the expression of these genes was insufficient to form detectable protein levels in the protein characterization.

The genes cry4 and cyt1 were found in almost all strains in this study, which are also the genes responsible for the high mortality of A. grandis (Monnerat et al., 2012). These genes were also identified in the strains B. thuringiensis subsp. israelensis and subsp. morrisoni (PG14) (Choi et al., 2004; Waalwijk et al., 1985), which are considered toxic to H. hampei (Méndez-López et al., 2003). Therefore, these studies provide evidence of the important role of these toxins in activity against the order Coleoptera.

Thus, among other hypotheses, the toxic effect of the strains against H. hampei might be due to the action of Cry4 and Cyt1 proteins. Although only toxic to Diptera in vitro (Höfte and Whiteley, 1989), the Cyt1 proteins have also shown their potential against H. hampei, A. grandis and Chrysomela scripta Fabricius, 1801 (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), when individually tested against these beetles (Federici and Bauer, 1998).

In addition to their insecticidal activity, the Cyt1 proteins also suppress high selection levels of C. scripta populations resistant to the Cry3A protein (Federici and Bauer, 1998). This action may be due to the structure and differentiated mode of action of Cyt proteins, which make them powerful allies in the management of cross-resistance of insect pests both in the composition of biological insecticides and the construction of genetically modified plants.

Delécluse et al. (1991) showed that the Cyt1A protein was not essential for the entomopathogenic activity of B. thuringiensis subsp. israelensis against A. aegypti and Culex pipiens Linnaeus, 1758 (Diptera: Culicidae), because the suppression of the cyt1A gene resulted in a strain similar to the wild entomopathogenic strains. However, the frequent occurrence of Cyt1A protein crystals suggests that it may be a significant component of the entomopathogenic feature of B. thuringiensis subsp. israelensis strains; for example, in synergistic action in conjunction with other proteins or other virulence factors capable of increasing the toxicity of the strain (Chilcott and Ellar, 1988).

The synergism between the toxins produced by B. thuringiensis subsp. israelensis was also observed between the Cry4 and Cyt1 proteins by Tabashnik (1992) who estimated the LC50 values of Cry4 and Cyt1 proteins against A. aegypti larvae. The values were 10-fold lower when these proteins were tested in combination than when each was used separately.

Given the functions and role of the Cyt1 protein, the protein is likely an important component of the protein assembly of the toxic strains against H. hampei. The Cyt1 protein should be tested separately and combined with other proteins in future research. Similarly, in addition to assessing strain toxicity to a pest, the synergistic relationships of the Cyt1 protein with other proteins and the effect on suppression or delay in cases of resistance of insects to other proteins of B. thuringiensis inserted into transgenic plants require further investigation.

This observation may assist researchers in deciding whether the insertion of one or more cry and cyt genes into coffee plants will yield plants more resistant to H. hampei, because in addition to the synergism between the Cry and Cyt proteins, some authors show that expression of multiple B. thuringiensis toxins can reduce instances of selection of insect populations resistant to Cry proteins (Li et al., 2014; Moar et al., 1990). Faced with the necessity to study the gene pool found in more strains, the knowledge of each cry gene function published in previous papers is of utmost importance for the selection of genes for the control of H. hampei, which shall initially be submitted to bioassays, together and individually.

The strains most toxic to H. hampei selected in this study, except for strain BR67, amplified the cry4A and cry4B genes. As shown in previous works, these genes show toxicity not only to Diptera but also to Coleoptera, which is significant, because in addition to the important individual toxicity of Cry4A and Cry4B proteins, reports indicate synergistic activity against mosquito larvae (Bravo et al., 2007).

The cry11 gene that was amplified in almost all evaluated strain, encodes the Cry11 protein which is one of the most active proteins against A. aegypti (Crickmore et al., 1995). However, when individually tested against the coleopteran A. grandis, the protein showed low toxicity (Monnerat et al., 2012). Additionally, studies conducted by Méndez-López et al. (2003) revealed that strains containing Cry11 proteins, i.e., B. thuringiensis subsp. fukuokaensis (strain T03C-001), jegathesan (strain T28A-001) and medellin (strain T30-001) (Crickmore et al., 1998), were not toxic to H. hampei. Thus, we inferred that the cry11 gene alone might not be responsible for the toxicity to H. hampei in the present study.

The Cry3 protein, which has known biological activity against Coleoptera (Van Frankenhuyzen, 2009), is also toxic to H. hampei (López-Pazos et al., 2009). Furthermore, this protein was identified in a B. thuringiensis strain in coffee plantations in Costa Rica (Arrieta et al., 2004). Strain BR67 was the only one to obtain an amplification product for the cry3 gene alone. However, the LC50 value of this strain did not differ significantly from those of the standard IPS-82 strain and the other strains in the group of greater toxicity. Strain BR67 also showed a single band between 65 and 70kDa in the protein profile, which corresponds to the cry3 gene.

In contrast to the results reported by Méndez-López et al. (2003) and those in the present study, López-Pazos et al. (2009) found no mortality of H. hampei caused by B. thuringiensis subsp. israelelensis IPS-82. The latter authors explained that the absence of death was most likely due to differences in the IPS-82 strain caused by changes in the colonies of B. thuringiensis. Such divergences can result from different conditions of crop cultivation, such as nutrition and incubation temperature, which lead to a loss of multicellular attributes. These dissimilarities may also be attributable to any mutation occurring in the gene promoters essential for the toxicity of the bacteria.

Other methodological divergences might also have influenced the results; for example, the bioassays conducted by López-Pazos et al. (2009) were performed only with Cry recombinant proteins. Nevertheless, the work of Méndez-López et al. (2003) and this study, with the initial objective to analyze the entire contents of the strains, used spore and crystal mixtures. Thus, toxicity to the insect could be related not only to Cry proteins, but also to the virulence factors, such as proteases, chitinases, proteins in the vegetative phase and Cyt proteins. The sample purification protocol can also result in differences because the toxin content can vary between 20 and 90% in unpurified preparations. Additionally, the purification method can influence the outcomes in cases of comparison of toxicity when using the same strain.

Microscopic analysis of the morphology of crystals of a strain can provide information on its insecticidal activity (Lereclus et al., 1993; Saadoun et al., 2001; Tailor et al., 1992). All strains toxic to H. hampei selected in this study had the same morphology of spherical crystals, which usually identify strains toxic to Diptera, as cited by Roh et al. (2007).

Among the most toxic strains assessed in this work, the LC50 values of four did not differ significantly from that of the standard IPS-82. Among these strains, BR58 and BR137 exhibited high potential to control H. hampei, because although the molecular profile did not differ, they had lower LC50 values than the standard strain. Ibarra et al. (2003) observed similar results in identifying new strains of B. thuringiensis with toxic activity towards A. aegypti, with four strains that were more toxic than the standard levels of B. thuringiensis subsp. israelensis but presented a similar genetic profile.

The above results demonstrate that bioassays of strains and cry genes must be conducted against insects both separately and together, because even with the same gene content, they can cause different levels of toxicity. Alternatively, strains may contain genes that are the determining factor for toxicity against the pest but are not identified by PCR.

In addition to cry and cyt genes, other virulence factors in B. thuringiensis strains can contribute to bacteria toxicity (Vilas-Bôas et al., 2012). Moreover, synergistic interactions can occur among the Cry proteins or even among these proteins and spores. However, because of the variation in toxicity of each protein, establishing an individual contribution to the toxic effect of a strain is difficult (Glare and O’Callaghan, 2000; Visser et al., 1990). These types of interaction could also explain the different levels of toxicity obtained by the strains tested, which although in a similar gene pool, showed different LC50 values for H. hampei.

Several groups have focused their research on searching for highly toxic strains of B. thuringiensis containing multiple Cry proteins with the aim to obtain specificity in the control of different insect pests and more options for the management of insects resistant to certain genes (Bobrowski et al., 2003). Thus, strains of B. thuringiensis toxic to H. hampei expressing a diversified gene content, containing more than one gene that might be toxic to the pest, are of extreme importance for the management of insect resistance to genetically modified plants.

As observed in this study, for most of the toxic strains, this gene diversity may permit the use of combined genes by adding the expression product of more than one gene to bind to different membrane receptors inserted in the same plant (Van Rie, 1999). Consequently, the probability of an insect becoming more resistant to a toxin will be reduced, which favors longer-term viability of genetically modified coffee plants (Degrande and Fernandes, 2006).

Further studies should consider the possibility of inserting one or more genes into the coffee plant to complement this work. With the results obtained to date, i.e., the selection of 11 strains virulent against H. hampei and identification of their gene pools, new insights will likely be yielded in future genetic investigations that examine the effect of each gene. Moreover, these surveys will help researchers understand the relationships among these strains and lead to further steps towards increasing their toxicity or even prevent the selection of resistant insects. Additionally, studies aiming at the selection of cry genes can be extended to include other important coffee pests, such as Leucoptera coffeella (Guérin Mèneville and Perrottet, 1842) (Lepidoptera: Lyonetiidae).


Among the 34 strains studied, 11 caused mortality to H. hampei larvae that exceeded 96%. From the selective bioassay, strains BR58, BR137, BR80 and BR67 had the lowest LC50 values and did not differ from the standard IPS82. The protein profiles produced bands with molecular masses of 28, 65, 70 and 130kDa. The molecular characterization showed the presence of cry1, cry2, cry3, cry4A, cry4B, cry10, cry11 and cyt1 genes. The morphological analysis revealed that all strains had spherical crystals, very similar to those found in B. thuringiensis subsp. israelensis. As a result, these isolates have potential for biotechnological control of H. hampei and should be important candidates for more studies and for use as gene sources for the construction of transgenic coffee plants.

Conflicts of interest

The author declares no conflicts of interest.


The authors wish to thank the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) for financial support.

[Angelo et al., 2010]
E.A. Angelo, G.T. Vilas-Bôas, R.J.H. Castro-Gómez.
Bacillus thuringiensis: características gerais e fermentação.
Semin. Ciên. Agrar., 31 (2010), pp. 945-958
[Arrieta et al., 2004]
G. Arrieta, A. Hernández, A.M. Espinoza.
Diversity of Bacillus thuringiensis strains isolated from coffee plantations infested with the coffee berry borer Hypothenemus hampei Ferrari.
Rev. Biol. Trop., 52 (2004), pp. 757-764
[Becker and Margalit, 1993]
V. Becker, J. Margalit.
Use of Bacillus thuringiensis israelensis against mosquitoes and blackflies.
Bacillus thuringiensis, an Environmental Biopesticide: Theory and Practice, pp. 147-169
[Berry et al., 2002]
C. Berry, S. O’Neil, E. Ben-Dov, A.F. Jones, L. Murphy, M.A. Quail, M.T. Holden, D. Harris, A. Zaritsky, J. Parkhill.
Complete sequence and organization of pBtoxis, the toxin-coding plasmid of Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. israelensis.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 68 (2002), pp. 5082-5095
[Bertani, 1951]
G. Bertani.
Studies on lysogenesis. I. The mode of phage liberation by lysogenic Escherichia coli.
J. Bacteriol., 62 (1951), pp. 293-300
[Bobrowski et al., 2003]
V.L. Bobrowski, L.M. Fiuza, G. Pasquali, M.H.B. Zanettini.
Genes de Bacillus thuringiensis: uma estratégia para conferir resistência a insetos em plantas.
Cienc. Rural., 33 (2003), pp. 1-9
[Bravo et al., 1998]
A. Bravo, S. Sarabia, L. Lopez, H. Ontiveros, C. Abarca, A. Ortiz, M. Ortiz, L. Lina, F.J. Villalobos, G. Peña, M.E. Nuñez-Valdez, M. Soberón, R. Quintero.
Characterization of cry genes in a Mexican Bacillus thuringiensis strain collection.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 64 (1998), pp. 4965-4972
[Bravo et al., 2007]
A. Bravo, S.S. Gill, M. Soberón.
Mode of action of Bacillus thuringiensis Cry and Cyt toxins and their potential for insect control.
[Canteri et al., 2001]
M.G. Canteri, R.A. Althaus, J.S. Virgens Filho, E.A. Giglioti, C.V. Godoy.
SASM-Agri: Sistema para análise e separação de médias em experimentos agrícolas pelos métodos Scott-Knott, Tukey e Duncan.
Rev. Bras. Agrocomput., 1 (2001), pp. 18-24
[Céron et al., 1995]
J. Céron, A. Ortíz, R. Quintero, L. Güereca, A. Bravo.
Specific PCR primers directed to identify cry1 and cry3 genes within a Bacillus thuringiensis strains collection.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 61 (1995), pp. 3826-3831
[Chilcott and Ellar, 1988]
C.N. Chilcott, D.J. Ellar.
Comparative toxicity of Bacillus thuringiensis var. israelensis crystal proteins in vivo and in vitro.
J. Gen. Microbiol., 134 (1988), pp. 2551-2558
[Choi et al., 2004]
Y.J. Choi, E.J. Kim, Z. Piao, Y.C. Yun, Y.C. Shin.
Purification and characterization of chitosanase from Bacillus sp. strain KCTC 0377BP and its application for the production of chitosan oligosaccharides.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 70 (2004), pp. 4522-4531
[Crickmore et al., 1998]
N. Crickmore, D.R. Zeigler, J. Feitelson, E. Schnepf, J. Van Rie, D. Lereclus, J. Baum, D.H. Dean.
Revision of the nomenclature for the Bacillus thuringiensis pesticidal crystal proteins.
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev., 62 (1998), pp. 807-813
[Crickmore et al., 1995]
N. Crickmore, J.B. Eileen, A.W. Juliet, J.E. David.
Contribution of the individual components of the d-endotoxin crystal to the mosquitocidal activity of Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. israelensis.
FEMS Microbiol. Lett., 131 (1995), pp. 249-254
[Degrande and Fernandes, 2006]
P.E. Degrande, M.G. Fernandes.
O Brasil com Bt.
Cultivar, 87 (2006), pp. 16-21
[Delécluse et al., 1991]
A. Delécluse, J.F. Charles, A. Klier, G. Rapoport.
Deletion by in vivo recombination shows that the 28-kilodalton cytolytic polypeptide from Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. israelensisis not essential for mosquitocidal activity.
J. Microbiol., 173 (1991), pp. 3374-3381
[Delécluse et al., 1995]
A. Delécluse, M.L. Rosso, A. Ragni.
Cloning and expression of a novel toxin gene from Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. jegathesan encoding a highly mosquitocidal protein.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 61 (1995), pp. 4230-4235
[Downes and Ito, 2001]
F.P. Downes, K. Ito.
Compendium of Methods for the Microbiological Examination of Foods.
American Public Health Association, (2001),
[Federici and Bauer, 1998]
B. Federici, L.S. Bauer.
Cyt1Aa protein of Bacillus thuringiensis is toxic to the cottonwood leaf beetle. Chrysomela scripta, and suppresses high levels of resistance to Cry3Aa.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 64 (1998), pp. 4368-4371
[Finney, 1971]
D.J. Finney.
Probit Analysis.
3rd ed., Cambridge University Press, (1971),
[Glare and O’Callaghan, 2000]
T.R. Glare, M. O’Callaghan.
Bacillus thuringiensis: Biology Ecology and Safety.
John Wiley & Sons, (2000),
[Guerchicoff et al., 1997]
A. Guerchicoff, R.A. Ugalde, C.P. Rubinstein.
Identification and characterization of a previously undescribed cyt gene in Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. israelensis.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 63 (1997), pp. 2716-2721
[Höfte and Whiteley, 1989]
H. Höfte, H.R. Whiteley.
Insecticidal crystal proteins of Bacillus thuringiensis.
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. R, 53 (1989), pp. 242-255
[Ibarra et al., 2003]
J.E. Ibarra, M.C.D. Rincón, S. Ordúz, D. Noriega, G. Benintende, R. Monnerat, L. Regis, C.M.F. Oliveira, H. Lanz, M.H. Rodriguez, J. Sánchez, G. Peña, A. Bravo.
Diversity of Bacillus thuringiensis strains from Latin America with insecticidal activity against different mosquito species.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 69 (2003), pp. 5269-5274
[Janssen, 2011]
M.P.M. Janssen.
Endosulfan A closer look at the arguments against a worldwide phase out. RIVM letter report 601356002/2011. National Institute for Public Health and the Environment.
Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sport, (2011),
[Laemmli, 1970]
U.K. Laemmli.
Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4.
Nature, 227 (1970), pp. 680-685
[Lecadet et al., 1992]
M.M. Lecadet, J. Chaufaux, J. Ribier, D. Lereclus.
Construction of novel Bacillus thuringiensis strain with different insecticidal activities by transduction and transformation.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 58 (1992), pp. 840-849
[LeOra Software, 1987]
LeOra Software.
POLO- PC: A User's Guide to Probit or Logit Analysis.
Leora Software, (1987),
58 pp.
[Lereclus et al., 1989]
D. Lereclus, C. Bourgouin, M.M. Lecadet, A. Klier, G. Rapoport.
Role, structure and molecular organization of the genes coding for the parasporal dendotoxins of Bacillus thuringiensis.
Regulation of Prokaryotic Development, pp. 71-88
[Lereclus et al., 1993]
D. Lereclus, A. Delécluse, M.M. Lecadet.
Diversity of Bacillus thuringiensis toxins and genes.
Bacillus thuringiensis, an Environmental biopesticide: Theory and Practice, pp. 37-69
[Li et al., 2014]
L. Li, Y. Zhu, S. Jin, X. Zhang.
Pyramiding Bt genes for increasing resistance of cotton to two major lepidopteran pests: Spodoptera litura and Heliothis armigera.
Acta Physiol. Plant., 36 (2014), pp. 2717-2727
[López-Pazos et al., 2009]
S.A. López-Pazos, J.E.C. Gómez, J.A. Cerón-Salamanca.
Cry1B and Cry3A are active against Hypothenemus hampei Ferrari (Coleoptera: Scolytidae).
J. Invertebr. Pathol., 101 (2009), pp. 242-245
[Lubick, 2010]
N. Lubick.
Endosulfan's exit: U.S. EPA pesticide review leads to a ban.
[Méndez-López et al., 2003]
I. Méndez-López, R. Basurto-Ríos, J.E. Ibarra.
Bacillus thuringiensis serovar israelensis is highly toxic to the coffee berry borer Hypothenemus hampei Ferr. (Coleoptera: Scolytidae).
FEMS Microbiol. Lett., 226 (2003), pp. 73-77
[Moar et al., 1990]
W.J. Moar, L. Masson, R. Brousseau, J.T. Trumble.
Toxicity to Spodoptera exigua and Trichoplusia ni of individual P1 protoxins and sporulated cultures of Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. kurstaki HD-1 and NRD-12.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 56 (1990), pp. 2480-2483
[Monnerat et al., 2012]
R.G. Monnerat, E. Martins, L. Praça, V. Dumas, C. Berry.
Activity of a Brazilian strain of Bacillus thuringiensis israelensis against the cotton boll weevil Anthonomus grandis Boheman (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae).
Neotrop. Entomol., 41 (2012), pp. 62-67
[Reis, 2007]
P.R. Reis.
Controle químico no manejo integrado da broca-do-café.
Manejo da broca-do-café, pp. 151-175
[Ricieto et al., 2013]
A.P.S. Ricieto, F.A.P. Fazion, C.D. Carvalho Filho, L.A. Vilas-Boas, G.T. Vilas-Bôas.
Effect of vegetation on the presence and genetic diversity of Bacillus thuringiensis in soil.
Can. J. Microbiol., 59 (2013), pp. 28-33
[Roh et al., 2007]
J.Y. Roh, J.Y. Choi, M.S. Li, B.R. Jin, Y.H. Je.
Bacillus thuringiensis as a Specific safe and effective tool for insect pest control.
J. Microbiol. Biotech., 17 (2007), pp. 547-559
[Saadoun et al., 2001]
I. Saadoun, F. Al-Momani, M. Obeidat, M. Meqdam, A. Elbetieha.
Assessment of toxic potential of local Jordanian Bacillus thuringiensis strains on Drosophila melanogaster and Culex sp (Diptera).
J. Appl. Microbiol., 90 (2001), pp. 866-872
[Schnepf et al., 1998]
E. Schnepf, N. Crickmore, J. Van Rie, D. Lereclus, J. Baum, J. Feitelson, D.R. Zeigler, D.H. Dean.
Bacillus thuringiensis and its pesticidal crystal proteins.
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev., 62 (1998), pp. 775-806
[Souza et al., 2013]
J.C. Souza, P.R. Reis, R.A. Silva, T.A.F. Carvalho, A.B. Pereira.
Controle químico da broca-do-café com cyantraniliprole.
Coffee Sci., 8 (2013), pp. 404-410
[Sun et al., 2008]
Y. Sun, Z. Fu, X. Ding, L. Xia.
Evaluating the insecticidal genes and their expressed products in Bacillus thuringiensis strains by combining PCR with Mass Spectrometry.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 74 (2008), pp. 6811-6813
[Tabashnik, 1992]
B.E. Tabashnik.
Evaluation of synergism among Bacillus thuringiensis toxins.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 58 (1992), pp. 3342-3346
[Tailor et al., 1992]
R. Tailor, J. Tippett, G. Gibb, S. Pells, L. Jordan, S. Ely.
Identification and Characterization of a Novel Bacillus thuringiensis δ-endotoxin Entomocidal to Coleopteran and Lepidopteran Larvae.
Mol. Microbiol., 6 (1992), pp. 1211-1217
[Thorne et al., 1986]
L. Thorne, F. Garduno, T. Thompson, D. Decker, M. Zounes, M. Wild, A.M. Walfield, T.J. Pollock.
Structural similarity between the lepidoptera- and diptera-specific insecticidal endotoxin genes of Bacillus thuringiensis subsp “kurstaki” and “israelensis”.
J. Bacteriol., 166 (1986), pp. 801-811
[USDA, 2014]
USDA, 2014. Agricultural Projections to 2017. Available at: (accessed 25 May 2014).
[Van Frankenhuyzen, 2009]
K. Van Frankenhuyzen.
Insecticidal activity of Bacillus thuringiensis crystal proteins.
J Invertebr Pathol., 101 (2009), pp. 1-16
[Van Rie, 1999]
J. Van Rie.
Insects Control with transgenic plants: resistance proof?.
Trends Biotechnol., 9 (1999), pp. 177-179
[Vega et al., 2012a]
F.E. Vega, A.P. Davis, J. Jaramillo.
From forest to plantation? Obscure articles reveal alternative host plants for the coffee berry borer, Hypothenemus hampei (Coleoptera: Curculionidae).
Biol. J. Linn. Soc., 107 (2012), pp. 86-94
[Vega et al., 2009]
F.E. Vega, F. Infante, A. Castillo, J. Jaramillo.
The coffee berry borer Hypothenemus hampei (Ferrari) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae): a short review, with recent findings and future research directions.
Terr. Arthropod. Rev., 2 (2009), pp. 129-147
[Vega et al., 2012b]
F.E. Vega, N.V. Meyling, J.J. Luangsa-ard, M. Blackwll.
Fungal entomopathogens.
Insect Pathology, 2nd ed., pp. 172-220
[Vidal-Quist et al., 2009]
J.C. Vidal-Quist, P. Castañera, J. González-Cabrera.
Diversity of Bacillus thuringiensis strains isolated from citrus orchards in Spain and evaluation of their insecticidal activity against Ceratitis capitata.
J. Microbiol. Biotech., 19 (2009), pp. 749-759
[Vilas-Bôas et al., 2012]
G.T. Vilas-Bôas, R.C. Alvarez, C.A. Santos, L.A. Vilas-Boas.
Fatores de Virulência de Bacillus thuringiensis Berliner: O Que Existe Além das Proteínas Cry?.
EntomoBrasilis., 5 (2012), pp. 1-10
[Vilas-Bôas et al., 2007]
G.T. Vilas-Bôas, A.P.S. Peruca, O.M.N. Arantes.
Biology and taxonomy of Bacillus cereus. Bacillus anthracis and Bacillus thuringiensis.
Can. J. Microbiol., 53 (2007), pp. 673-687
[Villacorta and Barrera, 1993]
A. Villacorta, J.F. Barrera.
Nova dieta merídica para criação de Hypothenemus hampei (Ferrari) (Coleoptera: Scolytidae).
An. Soc. Entomol. Brasil., 22 (1993), pp. 405-409
[Visser et al., 1990]
B. Visser, E. Munsterman, A. Stoker, W.G. Dirkse.
A novel Bacillus thuringiensis gene encoding a Spodoptera exigua-specific crystal protein.
J. Bacteriol., 172 (1990), pp. 6783-6788
[Waalwijk et al., 1985]
C. Waalwijk, A.M. Dullemans, M. Van Workum, B. Visser.
Molecular cloning and nucleotide sequence of the M28 crystal protein gene of Bacillus thuringiensis var. israelensis.
Nucleic Acids Res., 13 (1985), pp. 8207-8217

Associate Editor: Regiane Bueno.

Copyright © 2018. Sociedade Brasileira de Entomologia
Revista Brasileira de Entomologia

Subscribe to our newsletter

Article options
en pt
Cookies policy Política de cookies
To improve our services and products, we use "cookies" (own or third parties authorized) to show advertising related to client preferences through the analyses of navigation customer behavior. Continuing navigation will be considered as acceptance of this use. You can change the settings or obtain more information by clicking here. Utilizamos cookies próprios e de terceiros para melhorar nossos serviços e mostrar publicidade relacionada às suas preferências, analisando seus hábitos de navegação. Se continuar a navegar, consideramos que aceita o seu uso. Você pode alterar a configuração ou obter mais informações aqui.